Real vs. Fake—Which Christmas Tree is Better?
This resource has been reviewed by SubjectToClimate's climate scientists and verified for scientific accuracy and up-to-date information. Learn about our review process →
Provided by: The Nature Conservancy|Published on: July 10, 2025
Articles/WebsitesScientist Reviewed
678910
Scientist Reviewed This resource has been reviewed by SubjectToClimate's climate scientists and verified for scientific accuracy and up-to-date information. Learn about our review process →
Synopsis
- In this article from The Nature Conservancy, students will learn how real Christmas trees are a more sustainable choice than fake ones.
- The question-answer style article discusses why fake trees are less sustainable and addresses concerns over cutting down trees.
Subjects: Earth and Space Sciences
Authors: The Nature Conservancy
Region: Global
Languages: English
Teaching Materials
Positives
- This article is brief and to the point while also explaining the reasoning behind the answer.
- Students will love the fun Christmas references throughout this article.
Prerequisites
- Teachers should be aware of the cultural makeup of their class and make sure not to alienate students who do not celebrate Christmas.
- It is also important for teachers to support students who may not have much control over their families' purchasing decisions and may be experiencing feelings of guilt and powerlessness.
- The article does not discuss the comparison if a family were to keep and reuse their fake tree for a long period of time, which could be something to research or have students discuss.
Differentiation & Implementation
- Before reading, teachers can have students answer the question the title poses and explain their reasoning. After reading, students can update or elaborate on their answers, citing information from the article.
- Have advanced students research if fertilizers and pesticides are used on tree farms or find out if they can be grown using regenerative practices.
- Students can create a diagram that shows the life cycle of real and fake Christmas trees, highlighting the environmental implications along the way. Have students discuss how many years a fake tree would need to be reused to make it more sustainable.
This resource from The Nature Conservancy provides students with an article to compare real and artificial Christmas trees from an environmental perspective. The article also links to additional resources on forest conservation, natural climate solutions, and global reforestation efforts, providing students with ways to learn more and take action (such as through the Plant a Billion Trees campaign). While it doesn’t include original data or detailed life-cycle analyses, this resource would be a great addition to classroom discussions about sustainable choices.
Teaching Tips
Standards
Resource Type and Format
About the Partner Provider
The Nature Conservancy
The Nature Conservancy is a global environmental nonprofit working to create a world where people and nature can thrive. The Nature Conservancy has grown to become one of the most effective and wide-reaching environmental organizations in the world.
Scientist Reviewed
This resource has been reviewed by SubjectToClimate's climate scientists and verified for scientific accuracy and up-to-date information. Our review process ensures that every resource in our library reflects the current state of climate science.
Learn about our review process →
